Busy weekend...
As if by magic, as England get booted out of the World Cup and the country basks in a heatwave, all sorts of New Labour unpleasantness has bubbled to the surface once more, the stench cunningly hidden by the reek of booze-addled mourners. (Note to Blair: Beckham resigned as Captain in a timely manner in order to enable his successor plenty of time to settle into the job before the next major tournament... Hint hint...)
So, this weekend has seen rumours of another 1,000 troops being sent to Afghanistan, where "we face defeat" - just the most prominent of a vast array of stories which would tend to suggest (as if we didn't know already) that the government is staggering around grasping for a purpose like a Blunkett without his dog.
So, why has the Home Office suspended all research projects? Dsquared was on the case, ready to trawl through the dross with an army of volunteers, but "Research Thursday" was cancelled without fanfare or prior warning.
"A spokesman said: 'There's a pause while we reaffirm what the department's main objectives are. Research has got to feed into policy and we want to do research into high-priority areas.'"These high priority areas are, it would appear, likely to include finding ways of removing protection from government whistleblowers, providing further justification for again rejecting calls for a proper inquiry into the 7/7 attacks, changing public perceptions that Blair has failed on crime (note to the Home Office - it's easier to be "tough on the causes of crime" if you, erm, actually do some research into what those causese might be), changing businesses' perception that the government will always sacrifice their interests to those of the United States, finding ways to overturn the centuries-old right to trial, getting over yet another defeat in the Labour heartland, hiding the ridiculousness of the utterly barmy (yet strangely sinister) protest exclusion zone, finding excuses for deportation tactics so harsh that even former Home Secretary Jack Straw thinks they're a bit off, and coming up with yet more excuses for holding any and all of us for 90 days without trial, courtesy of Gordon Brown.
Expect more anti-terror nonsense throughout this week in the run-up to the anniversary of the 7th July attacks on Friday, as Gordon tries to show us how tough he is and the rest of the government continue to try and make excuses for the utter lack of any progress in protecting us from swivel-eyed maniacs with bombs.
What, you don't seriously think you're any safer now than you were this time last year, do you? Of course you aren't. It is still just as easy to smuggle a load of bombs onto the underground, a bridge, a bus, a train etc. etc. etc. as it was on the 7th or 21st July 2005.
Because no matter how many draconian, high-profile measures they put in place supposedly to prevent another attack, no matter how many armed police they put on the streets, no matter how many people they lock up just in case, preventing another attack is impossible. Just look at Israel.
1 Comments:
Don't be silly, the causes of crime are criminals - just like the causes of terrorism are terrorists - and you get tough on them by locking them up. Ask John Denham:
We are convinced that the nature of the threat has changed, and so therefore has the response. Earlier arrest, which means longer detention, is serving an important new function in disrupting and preventing terrorism."
Which is odd, incidentally, since Denham was arguing the other side less than three months ago:
John Denham, the committee chairman, pointed out that the police could not name a single case when someone would have been charged as a terrorist if they had been held any longer. And what court would accept evidence from someone who had been held without charge for so long?
He must have been briefed.
Post a Comment