Reasons to be cheerful?
I was stuck on a rail replacement coach on my way back to London yesterday, which left me in the unusual situation of reading the Observer from cover to cover, including this rather interesting piece by Will Hutton.
His argument seems a solid one, that there are many reasons to think the current bout of opposition to the EU constitution won't carry over to the referendum itself. What is interesting is not that he praises the constitution as such (he takes its general desirability as a given) but rather that this is a no-nonsense riposte to the somewhat whiny argument that the referendum would be overwhelmingly "anti". Instead Hutton envisages the gradual build-up of institutional momentum as the, currently non-existant, "pro" campaign gets off the ground, boosted by "pro" votes in the other countries to hold referenda.
It's rather optimistic (especially his assertion that, in a poll based on the refererendum question, the "pros" are only 2 percentage points behind and his belief that the British press would change its hostility to the EU) but his basic theory seems sound: that dialogue and debate over the actual constitution (rather than half-baked conspiracy theories) and a growing understanding of what it actually means will lead to acceptance.
Which does mean I'll have to read the bloody thing. Bugger.
2 Comments:
Which does mean I'll have to read the bloody thing. Bugger.Steve, it is really not that bad if you keep the structure of the Constituton text in mind. It has 4 parts:
- part II is no more than the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, which was adopted in 2000. So if you had already formed your opinion about it, there is no real need to read it again;
- part III is the (in)famous "clean-up exercise" of the existing EU Treaties. It is mainly about which policy areas the EU should be involved in and which not. Nothing really new is in it that is not already in the Nice Treaty (which remains in force if the Constitution is not ratified);
- part IV contains "final provisions" typical for any treaty (when will it enter into force, how can it be changed) plus a few articles on the EU flag and anthem. In other words: just symbols, no substance;
So that leaves only the constitutional part I, which regulates legislative procedures and the distribution of powers, as the really important part to read.
Oh, and don't forget to glance through the Protocols at the end either. Some of them are interesting as well...
Thanks for the link. This is a very useful resource that should be more readily available. In fact, if the 'monkey himself is listening, perhaps a permanent link on the front page?
Post a Comment